rigth to life in armed conflict human rights

The right to life is protected during armed conflict, through various provisions in IHL. The question is thus how these two branches of law influence each other, and if IHL can be considered lex specialis in relation to human rights law. Human rights law, which has codified the right to life in its main instruments, is applicable both in time of peace and in time of war, whereas humanitarian law is only applicable during armed conflict. International criminal law criminalizes serious violations of IHL (i.e., war crimes) and also applies in situations outside of armed conflict, for examples where it is established crimes against humanity or genocide.A thesis about the right to life in internal armed conflict must necessarily take both human rights law and humanitarian law into account. It protects people who are not or are no longer participating in hostilities and restricts the means and methods of warfare, and place duties on both State parties to armed conflict, and non-State armed groups who are parties to armed conflict. International humanitarian law is a set of rules that seek to limit the effects of armed conflict. During conflict, international humanitarian, and criminal law also apply. International human rights law is the body of international legal treaties and normative standards that govern states' obligations to respect, protect, and fulfill human rights at all times, including during emergencies. As education is instrumental to protection, non-discrimination, and survival, it must be seen as a key human right. In an emergency context, key human rights, such as non-discrimination, protection and the right to life, take immediate priority, while the progressive realization of other rights may rely on available resources. Human rights are universal and inalienable: they cannot be given, nor taken away.

Human rights are a means to a life in dignity.

Rigth to life in armed conflict human rights